PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-5.49%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -149.05%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
5.54%
Some D&A expansion while SONO is negative at -10.71%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-661.70%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-0.77%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -1.13%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
61.89%
Slight usage while SONO is negative at -109.34%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-954.41%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -5335.32%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-11092.31%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONO at -451.44%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
6588.15%
AP growth well above SONO's 157.40%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-164.58%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 69.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
352.09%
Well above SONO's 2.38%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-4.24%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -90.84%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-53.99%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 27.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-400.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
20.33%
Purchases growth of 20.33% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-20.22%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-76.62%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 27.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-74.00%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.76%
We have some buyback growth while SONO is negative at -11.16%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.