PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-22.26%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -106.96%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.48%
Some D&A expansion while SONO is negative at -6.98%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
310.84%
Some yoy growth while SONO is negative at -675.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
-0.40%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -11.52%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-57.16%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONO is 72.37%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-110.35%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -123.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-104.17%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONO at -11.85%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
79.79%
AP growth well above SONO's 135.03%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-322.42%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONO at -166.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
78.07%
Well above SONO's 29.61%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-18.72%
Negative yoy CFO while SONO is 93.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
16.39%
CapEx growth well above SONO's 0.31%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
69.75%
Purchases growth of 69.75% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-26.78%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-70.91%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
145.70%
We have mild expansions while SONO is negative at -1066.44%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
-71.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.38%
Repurchase growth above 1.5x SONO's 0.77%. David Dodd would see a strong per-share advantage if the share price is reasonably valued.