PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
6.58%
Some net income increase while SONO is negative at -10649.66%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
2.14%
Less D&A growth vs. SONO's 21.31%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-211.57%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONO stands at 75.65%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
1.56%
SBC growth while SONO is negative at -3.21%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
98.51%
Slight usage while SONO is negative at -97.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-550.76%
AR is negative yoy while SONO is 246.35%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
2818.75%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -65.83%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
456.95%
A yoy AP increase while SONO is negative at -75.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
159.40%
Growth well above SONO's 261.62%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
519.51%
Well above SONO's 33.92%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
5.39%
Some CFO growth while SONO is negative at -1447.07%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-56.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -129.18%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-6750.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONO stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
17.65%
Purchases growth of 17.65% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-36.93%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
3.24%
Growth of 3.24% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-128.74%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 80.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
6.90%
Debt repayment growth of 6.90% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.72%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONO is 26.49%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.