PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
44.77%
Net income growth under 50% of SONO's 217.36%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.78%
D&A growth well above SONO's 3.03%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
100.00%
Well above SONO's 161.85% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
27.52%
SBC growth well above SONO's 11.10%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-3018.75%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONO is 212.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
166.96%
AR growth while SONO is negative at -131.73%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-515.40%
Negative yoy inventory while SONO is 219.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-139.05%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -606.39%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-39.91%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 169.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-284.30%
Both negative yoy, with SONO at -225.86%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
40.94%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 275.41%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-15.14%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 30.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
23.60%
Purchases growth of 23.60% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-20.05%
We reduce yoy sales while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
76.38%
Growth well above SONO's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-18.73%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 30.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
49.84%
Debt repayment well below SONO's 100.00%. Michael Burry suspects heavier leverage risk or insufficient cash generation to keep pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.28%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of SONO's 40.36%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26