PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-19.46%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -140.77%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-0.62%
Negative yoy D&A while SONO is 5.22%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.54%
Negative yoy SBC while SONO is 4.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
115.43%
Slight usage while SONO is negative at -251.54%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
24.47%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. SONO's 432.39%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
58.99%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -117.54%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-141.79%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONO at -82.47%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-100.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONO at -159.91%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-346.37%
Negative yoy while SONO is 236.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-16.01%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -161.97%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
23.00%
CapEx growth well above SONO's 40.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.29%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
49.10%
Liquidation growth of 49.10% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
24.82%
Growth of 24.82% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
260.48%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 40.68%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-60.60%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.61%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -6.04%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.