PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-17.71%
Negative net income growth while SONO stands at 23.10%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
5.31%
D&A growth well above SONO's 4.23%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.57%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -12.82%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
224.24%
Well above SONO's 95.42% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-137.34%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONO at -227.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
97.03%
Inventory growth well above SONO's 191.68%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
127.05%
AP growth well above SONO's 89.13%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
105.72%
Some yoy increase while SONO is negative at -48.11%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-7.63%
Negative yoy CFO while SONO is 107.87%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
28.22%
Some CapEx rise while SONO is negative at -91.44%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONO stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
12.38%
Liquidation growth of 12.38% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-377.36%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-81.16%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -91.44%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
-233.33%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.80%
Buyback growth at 50-75% of SONO's 16.55%. Martin Whitman questions partial disadvantage in per-share enhancements if competitor repurchases more.