PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
15.47%
Some net income increase while SONO is negative at -32.54%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-13.07%
Negative yoy D&A while SONO is 13.97%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.31%
SBC growth while SONO is negative at -5.57%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-909.08%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONO is 294.20%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-367.89%
AR is negative yoy while SONO is 249.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
4427.27%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -334.78%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
274.96%
AP growth well above SONO's 428.43%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-811.11%
Negative yoy while SONO is 64.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-18.13%
Negative yoy CFO while SONO is 149.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-3.34%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 38.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.32%
Purchases growth of 12.32% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
7.06%
Liquidation growth of 7.06% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
-15.42%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
447.83%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 38.85%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
73.43%
Debt repayment growth of 73.43% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.52%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -194.16%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.