PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
146.54%
Net income growth at 75-90% of SONO's 194.62%. Bill Ackman would call for strategic or operational tweaks to match competitor’s earnings growth.
5.81%
D&A growth well above SONO's 2.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.98%
Less SBC growth vs. SONO's 31.04%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-262.71%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONO is 1003.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
129.48%
AR growth while SONO is negative at -147.41%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
119.78%
Inventory growth well above SONO's 206.97%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-131.48%
Negative yoy AP while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-217.09%
Negative yoy usage while SONO is 261.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-565.23%
Both negative yoy, with SONO at -14.99%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
11.65%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONO's 513.88%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-1.10%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 16.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
42.13%
Purchases well above SONO's 53.58%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
28.65%
We have some liquidation growth while SONO is negative at -32.20%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-215.71%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
577.65%
Investing outflow well above SONO's 45.38%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
-410.56%
We cut debt repayment yoy while SONO is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly lowering risk more if expansions do not hamper them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.89%
We have some buyback growth while SONO is negative at -644.12%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.