PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-31.79%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONO at -239.63%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-13.60%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONO at -13.88%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.83%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONO at -20.65%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
39.48%
Slight usage while SONO is negative at -147.09%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
43.04%
AR growth is negative or stable vs. SONO's 211.36%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd would confirm it doesn't hamper sales volume.
199.07%
Some inventory rise while SONO is negative at -96.30%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-18.92%
Negative yoy AP while SONO is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
19.60%
Some yoy usage while SONO is negative at -563.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
89.65%
Some yoy increase while SONO is negative at -54.92%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
-19.99%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONO at -138.21%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
-4.46%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONO is 57.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.17%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -55.73%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-36.59%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONO at -2.88%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
94.69%
Growth of 94.69% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
-70.21%
We reduce yoy invests while SONO stands at 16.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
49.95%
Debt repayment growth of 49.95% while SONO is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild advantage that can reduce interest costs unless expansions demand capital here.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.71%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONO at -12.23%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.