229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-140.47%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 94.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
16.56%
D&A growth well above SONY's 4.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-252.44%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.17%
Well above SONY's 91.26% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
47.11%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -10.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while SONY is 56.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-648.62%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 688.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-37.18%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 8.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.47%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -60.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-78.31%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -92.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-23.70%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 387.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-213.27%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-192.71%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-1821.43%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -194.32%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.