229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
104.43%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 94.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-13.99%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 4.53%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
461.33%
Deferred tax of 461.33% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
147.03%
Well above SONY's 91.26% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-54.13%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -10.72%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.25%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONY's 56.45%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
451.81%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SONY's 688.01%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.45%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -60.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
149.62%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -92.24%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-518.75%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 387.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-13.18%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.65%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
-111.46%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -194.32%. Martin Whitman would see an overall reduced environment for buybacks in the niche or cyclical factor driving capital usage.