PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-25.89%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 94.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.90%
D&A growth well above SONY's 4.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-180.05%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2332.00%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 91.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-751.47%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -10.72%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
146.15%
Well above SONY's 56.45%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-91.04%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 688.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
23.52%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 8.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -60.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
62.00%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -92.24%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
173.33%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 387.64%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
3.83%
Lower net investing outflow yoy vs. SONY's 20.41%, preserving short-term cash. David Dodd would confirm expansions remain sufficient.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.49%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
63.76%
We have some buyback growth while SONY is negative at -194.32%. John Neff sees a short-term advantage in boosting EPS unless expansions hamper competitor.