PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-57.50%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 94.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-11.63%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 4.53%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
24.36%
Deferred tax of 24.36% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.79%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 91.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-170.90%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -227.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-69.05%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -10.72%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
833.33%
AP growth well above SONY's 75.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
25.81%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONY's 106.80%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-47.93%
Negative yoy while SONY is 56.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-104.59%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 688.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-220.13%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 8.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
86.75%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -60.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-30.88%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -92.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
126.47%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 387.64%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
700.00%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 20.41%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
100.00%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -848.12%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
760.00%
Issuance growth of 760.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.