229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
717.65%
Net income growth above 1.5x SONY's 94.38%. David Dodd would see a clear bottom-line advantage if it is backed by stable operations.
7.89%
D&A growth well above SONY's 4.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-212.89%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.00%
Well above SONY's 91.26% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
169.47%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -227.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
73.08%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -10.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-400.00%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 75.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-212.82%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 106.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
225.14%
Well above SONY's 56.45%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
935.29%
Operating cash flow growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 688.01%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better working capital management or consistent margin advantages.
67.69%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 8.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-330.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -60.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-87.33%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -92.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-211.11%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 387.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-257.81%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.70%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.