229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-215.00%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 94.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
82.61%
D&A growth well above SONY's 4.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
94.92%
Deferred tax of 94.92% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
127.99%
Well above SONY's 91.26% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
96.56%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -227.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
57.84%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -10.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
129.31%
AP growth well above SONY's 75.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
94.92%
Growth well above SONY's 106.80%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
-93.75%
Negative yoy while SONY is 56.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
127.79%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONY's 688.01%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
36.73%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 8.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-114.04%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -60.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-61.50%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -92.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
54.43%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 387.64%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-179.89%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-85.71%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.