PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-187.50%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 94.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
86.36%
D&A growth well above SONY's 4.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
411.11%
Deferred tax of 411.11% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
276.69%
Well above SONY's 91.26% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
391.53%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -227.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
488.00%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -10.72%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-353.57%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 75.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
1500.00%
Growth well above SONY's 106.80%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
196.12%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONY's 688.01%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-83.33%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 8.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
100.00%
Acquisition spending well above SONY's 42.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
-98.18%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -60.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
139.29%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -92.24%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-16.67%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 387.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-21.74%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
-1600.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -848.12%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting net new borrowings or weaker paydowns across the niche.
450.00%
Issuance growth of 450.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.