PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
129.19%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 94.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
-31.71%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 4.53%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-89.29%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-81.25%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 91.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-22.67%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -227.71%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-65.98%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -10.72%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
76.38%
AP growth well above SONY's 75.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-82.14%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 106.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while SONY is 56.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-33.33%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 688.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
36.36%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 8.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.03%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -60.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-3.48%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -92.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
50.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 387.64%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-203.57%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
99.02%
We repay more while SONY is negative at -848.12%. John Neff notes advantage in lowering leverage if competitor is ramping up debt or repaying less.
-95.45%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.