PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.18%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 94.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
4.35%
D&A growth well above SONY's 4.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-140.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
136.62%
Well above SONY's 91.26% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
159.52%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -227.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-86.79%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -10.72%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
312.50%
AP growth well above SONY's 75.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-121.43%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 106.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-63.64%
Negative yoy while SONY is 56.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
20.63%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONY's 688.01%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-280.00%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 8.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
59.46%
Acquisition spending well above SONY's 42.38%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier integration risk or short-term free cash flow drain vs. competitor.
1.41%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -60.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
38.01%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -92.24%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-190.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 387.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
66.05%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 20.41%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1000.00%
Issuance growth of 1000.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.