PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-45.32%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 94.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-655.56%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
528.57%
Well above SONY's 91.26% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
333.70%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -227.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
-218.18%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -10.72%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
1900.00%
AP growth well above SONY's 75.19%. Michael Burry would be concerned about potential late payments or short-term liquidity strain relative to competitor.
-80.00%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 106.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
58.42%
Well above SONY's 56.45%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
147.73%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONY's 688.01%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-128.57%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 8.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 42.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-66.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -60.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-13.88%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -92.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
275.00%
Growth well above SONY's 387.64%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-297.20%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
800.00%
Issuance growth of 800.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.