229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-14.16%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 94.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
19.05%
D&A growth well above SONY's 4.53%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
14.63%
Deferred tax of 14.63% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a partial difference that can matter for future cash flow if large in magnitude.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.85%
Well above SONY's 91.26% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
43.75%
AR growth while SONY is negative at -227.71%. John Neff would note competitor possibly improving working capital while we allow AR to rise.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.70%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 75.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-40.00%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 106.80%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
50.00%
Well above SONY's 56.45%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
283.61%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONY's 688.01%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
59.26%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 8.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
-49.50%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 42.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
12.45%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -60.51%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-26.94%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -92.24%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
150.00%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 387.64%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-3266.67%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 20.41%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-90.00%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.