229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-221.76%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
33.33%
D&A growth of 33.33% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost difference that must be justified by expansions.
-936.36%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
720.51%
Working capital change of 720.51% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might affect near-term cash flow.
3557.14%
AR growth of 3557.14% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
142.86%
Inventory growth of 142.86% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate build that must match future sales to avoid risk.
-544.44%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-366.67%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
27.50%
Growth of 27.50% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might reflect intangible expansions or partial write-offs.
-108.23%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
29.03%
CapEx growth of 29.03% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild cost burden that must yield returns in future revenue or margins.
-11.90%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
48.95%
Purchases growth of 48.95% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
28.31%
Liquidation growth of 28.31% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in monetizing portfolio items that must be justified by market valuations.
85.00%
Growth of 85.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate difference requiring justification by ROI in these smaller invests.
273.21%
We expand invests by 273.21% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a moderate outflow that must be justified by returns vs. competitor’s stable approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.43%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.