PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
5.26%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 56.92%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
3.57%
D&A growth well above SONY's 0.30%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
500.00%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -200.55%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1916.67%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 88.61%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-356.25%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
75.00%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. SONY's 155.37%, indicating lean supply management. David Dodd would confirm no demand shortfall.
441.38%
AP growth of 441.38% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-566.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -45.39%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
110.00%
Well above SONY's 64.98%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
-95.24%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 136.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-19.44%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -73.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
-100.00%
Negative yoy acquisition while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential short-term cash advantage unless competitor’s deals yield big synergy.
-9.62%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -83354.45%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
-21.80%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 2128.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-520.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 233.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-97.84%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -74.95%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
227.27%
We slightly raise equity while SONY is negative at -100.49%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.