229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
86.67%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 1167.75%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
-6.06%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONY at -14.58%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
106.25%
Well above SONY's 203.44% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
24.59%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -186.65%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
11.48%
AR growth of 11.48% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
109.09%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -185.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-1442.86%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-700.00%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -188.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-90.77%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -128.07%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
34.15%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -94.56%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
68.75%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 29.60%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.20%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 7.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-43.75%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 31.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-65.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -65.07%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-73.90%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 53.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.75%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -100.00%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.