PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-26.98%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 2976.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
9.09%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 25.07%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
-66.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-14.29%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-125.44%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 87.23%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-99.44%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
178.79%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -28.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-36.23%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-8.33%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 157.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
100.00%
Lower 'other non-cash' growth vs. SONY's 2422.20%, indicating steadier reported figures. David Dodd would confirm no missed necessary write-downs or gains.
-72.15%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 396.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
20.45%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -38.34%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-47.09%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-57.46%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 4.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
-107.69%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -2191.00%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-623.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -92.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
137.50%
Issuance growth of 137.50% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.