PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
32.61%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 179.71%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.89%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -1.29%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
2350.00%
Well above SONY's 15.36% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
66.67%
SBC growth of 66.67% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
248.28%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -252.16%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-4500.00%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-134.62%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 176.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
174.47%
AP growth of 174.47% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
53.85%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -328.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.90%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SONY's 15.22%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-8.57%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 8.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-126.85%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
320.09%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -4.11%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-200.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 8.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-14.14%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 12.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
177.63%
Issuance growth of 177.63% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.