PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
73.77%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -141.25%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
-2.44%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 16.31%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-48.98%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
500.00%
Well above SONY's 260.51% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
-229.55%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-222.22%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -62.42%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
457.14%
AP growth of 457.14% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-33.33%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 170.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-42.86%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -134.69%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
109.95%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SONY's 0.44%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-55.26%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -14.01%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
25.95%
Purchases growth of 25.95% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-63.18%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 7.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
166.67%
Growth well above SONY's 16.46%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-52.61%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 23.31%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.82%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.