PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
178.30%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 161.13%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
2.50%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -27.97%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-132.00%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 62.56%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.34%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -216.38%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
37.24%
AR growth of 37.24% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-89.66%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -386.14%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-26.67%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-237.50%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -175.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
3450.00%
Well above SONY's 151.95%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
74.94%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -109.16%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
1.69%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -6.82%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-145.18%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
176.44%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SONY's 3.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
550.00%
Growth well above SONY's 105.62%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
-116.95%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -126.49%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
135.19%
Issuance growth of 135.19% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.