PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-1.69%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 124.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
362.50%
Well above SONY's 128.82% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.46%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 41.94%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
74.73%
AR growth of 74.73% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
85.45%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 78.79%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-87.41%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-7.41%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 8.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-3.52%
Negative yoy while SONY is 61.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-30.84%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 690.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
25.86%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 7.80%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.65%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
126.99%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -12.19%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-346.15%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -2568.21%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
40.32%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 24.39%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.16%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.