PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
8.62%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 173.93%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
12.20%
D&A growth well above SONY's 7.88%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-161.90%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
70.00%
SBC growth of 70.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
172.97%
Well above SONY's 66.53% if positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a risk of bigger working capital demands vs. competitor, harming free cash flow.
365.22%
AR growth of 365.22% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-262.50%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 698.58%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
-775.00%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
234.48%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -66.96%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-95.62%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -127.29%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-11.94%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 69.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-46.51%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 21.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.30%
Purchases growth of 20.30% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
29.90%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -10.58%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
68.75%
Growth well above SONY's 25.10%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
133.55%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 33.36%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-58.55%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.