229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
36.51%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -138.65%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
10.87%
D&A growth well above SONY's 1.89%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
1561.54%
Well above SONY's 73.14% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
-35.29%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-33.66%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 688.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-211.48%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
196.55%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -74.53%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
202.47%
AP growth of 202.47% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-123.08%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 223.55%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-50.00%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -80.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
59.32%
Operating cash flow growth above 1.5x SONY's 36.64%. David Dodd would confirm superior cost control or stronger revenue-to-cash conversion.
-52.38%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -16.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-65.78%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
29.91%
Below 50% of SONY's 103.70%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
180.00%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -18.72%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-240.66%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 60.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.46%
Issuance growth of 17.46% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.