PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
31.40%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 86.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
1.96%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -18.30%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-63.16%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 78.42%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
300.00%
SBC growth of 300.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-768.66%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -207.27%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-541.18%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-382.14%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -325.13%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
348.59%
AP growth of 348.59% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-8466.67%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -188.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-100.00%
Negative yoy while SONY is 156.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-62.37%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONY at -128.87%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
14.58%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -4.59%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.19%
Purchases growth of 17.19% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild difference in portfolio building that might matter for returns.
-3.11%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -48.52%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-550.00%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 107.37%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
121.68%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -196.76%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
81.08%
Issuance growth of 81.08% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.