PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.43%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 491.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
-3.85%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 46.26%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-81.43%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 2748.92%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-4.55%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
-43.53%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 23.85%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
207.80%
AR growth of 207.80% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
150.63%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -44.61%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-170.55%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
45.01%
Growth well above SONY's 50.92%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-144.17%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 154.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-135.37%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -4.60%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.94%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -30.43%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
-3.21%
We reduce yoy sales while SONY is 85.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees competitor possibly capitalizing on market peaks or forced to raise cash while we hold tight.
30.56%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -90.53%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
2547.31%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 14.88%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.79%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.