PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
85.24%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SONY's 148.26%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
12.12%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -14.68%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
149.32%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SONY's 4722.81%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
15.00%
SBC growth of 15.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
12.11%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -297.43%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-126.38%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
42.11%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -109.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-43.56%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
210.96%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -184.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-50.00%
Negative yoy while SONY is 202.39%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
71.85%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -135.42%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-77.24%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 3.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.23%
Purchases well above SONY's 20.01%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
412.58%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SONY's 61.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
178.95%
Growth well above SONY's 19.04%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
54.78%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 54.55%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
215.63%
Stock issuance far above SONY's 100.00%. Michael Burry flags a significant dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach unless ROI is very high.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.