229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-23.31%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONY at -94.37%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-6.76%
Both reduce yoy D&A, with SONY at -3.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lull in expansions or intangible additions for both.
-32.88%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
36.96%
SBC growth of 36.96% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-135.68%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 95.59%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
287.80%
AR growth of 287.80% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
387.88%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -18.32%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-399.39%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
18.50%
Lower 'other working capital' growth vs. SONY's 174.79%. David Dodd would see fewer unexpected short-term demands on cash.
-80.00%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -284.72%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-59.51%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 125.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
19.84%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 3.83%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.30%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 4.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
81.06%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -28.08%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-113.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -41.86%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
20.75%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -46.24%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.74%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.