PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
74.89%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 198.40%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
13.98%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 232.93%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
117.19%
Well above SONY's 160.31% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
61.76%
SBC growth of 61.76% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
26.53%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -224.65%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-33.04%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-18.95%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -1118.26%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-60.46%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
559.54%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -160.86%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
180.00%
Some yoy increase while SONY is negative at -97.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly reining in intangible charges or revaluations more effectively than we do.
64.33%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -123.28%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
0.85%
Lower CapEx growth vs. SONY's 10.87%, potentially boosting near-term free cash. David Dodd would confirm no missed expansions that competitor might exploit.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-186.33%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -93.93%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
4.68%
Below 50% of SONY's 11.01%. Michael Burry would see minimal near-term inflows vs. competitor’s liquidation approach.
26.67%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -80.17%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
-974.24%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -170.74%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.11%
Issuance growth of 152.11% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
100.00%
Buyback growth of 100.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a modest per-share advantage that might accumulate if the stock is below intrinsic value.