PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-33.90%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 10.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
9.43%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -11.30%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-172.73%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
20.00%
SBC growth of 20.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-108.39%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 81.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
214.57%
AR growth of 214.57% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
184.07%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 47.75%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-352.89%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-19.50%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 120.91%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-128.57%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -1491.66%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
-57.19%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 126.78%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
7.33%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -22.08%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.90%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 21.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
89.54%
1.25-1.5x SONY's 78.38%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a sizable advantage unless competitor’s portfolio yields future gains.
-89.47%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -101.12%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
60.66%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 63.08%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -90.79%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.