PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
2.58%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 163.79%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
0.86%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 3.98%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
318.75%
Well above SONY's 153.42% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
0.76%
SBC growth of 0.76% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
48.75%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 179.22%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-102.89%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-290.53%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 255.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
60.29%
AP growth of 60.29% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-23.59%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -407.51%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
225.00%
Well above SONY's 50.61%. Michael Burry would worry about large intangible write-downs or revaluation gains overshadowing real performance.
10.73%
Operating cash flow growth below 50% of SONY's 1490.50%. Michael Burry would see a serious shortfall in day-to-day cash profitability.
-53.49%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 22.69%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.14%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. SONY's 376.65%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
-38.12%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -244.73%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-150.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -497737.28%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-0.73%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 115.30%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
229.63%
Lower share issuance yoy vs. SONY's 7755.24%, implying less dilution. David Dodd would confirm the firm still has enough capital for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.