229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
98.50%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -1.81%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
25.37%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 223.07%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
167.48%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -236.73%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
20.57%
SBC growth of 20.57% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-67.68%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -403.55%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
127.59%
AR growth of 127.59% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
213.89%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -1725.50%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-142.10%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-93.58%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -302.40%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.31%
Both yoy CFO lines are negative, with SONY at -151.06%. Martin Whitman would suspect cyclical or cost factors harming the entire niche’s cash generation.
16.35%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 22.59%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.47%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 80.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
8.80%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -82.29%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-100.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -85.23%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-333.47%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 44.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.94%
We slightly raise equity while SONY is negative at -98.92%. John Neff sees competitor possibly preserving share count or buying back shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.