PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-28.16%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONY at -41.26%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
7.74%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 18.57%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
6.52%
Lower deferred tax growth vs. SONY's 26.02%, implying fewer future tax liabilities. David Dodd would confirm there’s no short-term tax shock instead.
6.47%
SBC growth of 6.47% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see some additional share issuance that must be justified by expansions or retention needs.
-235.22%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 53.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
16.81%
AR growth of 16.81% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-25.66%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -63.15%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
0.91%
AP growth of 0.91% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-312.56%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 125.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
-85.71%
Negative yoy while SONY is 534.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term net income or CFO stability advantage unless competitor invests or writes down more aggressively.
-78.64%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 133.95%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
67.14%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -11.05%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.60%
Purchases well above SONY's 18.90%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
39.82%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -3.91%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
108.33%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -95.85%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
57.34%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -26.56%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.56%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -66.96%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment or preference for internal financing over new equity in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.