PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
102.88%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x SONY's 87.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify whether cost discipline or revenue gains drive the outperformance.
6.09%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -16.80%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
233.65%
Well above SONY's 98.43% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
13.89%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -5.64%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
13.50%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -106.23%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
140.15%
AR growth of 140.15% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-61.33%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -103.47%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
29.19%
AP growth of 29.19% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-71.47%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -110.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical factor pulling back on these items.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -63.02%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
85.88%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -87.13%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
19.28%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 28.25%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.08%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 54.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
7.22%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -40.12%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-483.33%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 139.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
-4.96%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 64.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Issuance growth of 100.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.