PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-9.00%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 26.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
3.35%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 143.72%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
10.12%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -1404.89%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
12.68%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -3.07%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-206.07%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 372.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-22.14%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
48.76%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -492.69%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-201.88%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-104.79%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 817.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.70%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 208.36%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
21.00%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 5.29%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.06%
Less growth in investment purchases vs. SONY's 39.82%, preserving near-term liquidity. David Dodd would confirm no strategic investment opportunities are lost.
33.85%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -46.56%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
214.29%
Growth well above SONY's 128.50%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier intangible or side spending overshadowing competitor’s approach, risking short-term FCF.
97.90%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 9.12%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.22%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.