PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
32.43%
Some net income increase while SONY is negative at -145.89%. John Neff would see a short-term edge over the struggling competitor.
20.51%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -159.52%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-64.94%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
2.28%
Less SBC growth vs. SONY's 29.32%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
2.92%
Less working capital growth vs. SONY's 297.09%, indicating potentially more efficient day-to-day cash usage. David Dodd would confirm no negative impact on revenue.
-267.74%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
64.14%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -103.94%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
23.50%
AP growth of 23.50% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
58.08%
Growth well above SONY's 104.38%. Michael Burry would see a potential hidden liquidity or overhead issue overshadowing competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.37%
Operating cash flow growth similar to SONY's 19.59%. Walter Schloss would see parallel improvements or market conditions in cash generation.
-29.87%
Negative yoy CapEx while SONY is 33.67%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term FCF boost unless competitor invests for long-term advantage.
92.07%
Acquisition growth of 92.07% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-1.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -11.79%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
9.53%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SONY's 1.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
152.17%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 618.28%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
19.28%
Investing outflow well above SONY's 0.73%. Michael Burry sees possible short-term FCF risk unless these invests pay off quickly vs. competitor’s approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.05%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.