PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
39.37%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 184.74%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
8.21%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 229.19%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
479.58%
Well above SONY's 221.09% if it’s a large positive yoy. Michael Burry would see a bigger future tax burden vs. competitor’s approach.
33.48%
SBC growth well above SONY's 65.82%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
241.94%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -205.17%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
74.94%
AR growth of 74.94% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
252.29%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -1573.52%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-32.88%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
75.14%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -155.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
-100.00%
Both negative yoy, with SONY at -94.53%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall environment of intangible cleanup or shifting revaluations for the niche.
71.97%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -101.85%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
-55.35%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -21.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
100.00%
Acquisition growth of 100.00% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
-18.76%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 24.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-21.53%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -20.11%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-195.83%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -87.30%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-144.79%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 12.29%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.20%
Issuance growth of 16.20% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.