PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-0.28%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 19.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
21.91%
D&A growth well above SONY's 3.09%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
-10.09%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
-4.01%
Both cut yoy SBC, with SONY at -101.02%. Martin Whitman would view it as an industry shift to reduce stock-based pay or a sign of reduced expansions.
-153.64%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 79.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
144.29%
AR growth of 144.29% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-127.11%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -10.36%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
-130.69%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 41.98%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-89.91%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 133.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.37%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 1847.62%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
48.06%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 17.91%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.89%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -68.70%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
115.00%
Proceeds from sales/maturities above 1.5x SONY's 51.69%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is capitalizing on strong valuations or freeing liquidity for expansions.
252.17%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 1883.98%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
85.81%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -31.77%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.50%
Issuance growth of 37.50% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.