PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
22.06%
Net income growth under 50% of SONY's 100.05%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues in generating bottom-line growth.
10.83%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -120.67%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-9.59%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 100.46%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
-1.05%
Negative yoy SBC while SONY is 4760.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see less immediate dilution advantage if talent levels remain strong.
292.51%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -32.15%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
-232.75%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
191.11%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 198.57%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
218.61%
A yoy AP increase while SONY is negative at -100.00%. John Neff would see competitor possibly improving relationships or liquidity more rapidly.
803.13%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -707.19%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.61%
Operating cash flow growth at 50-75% of SONY's 143.22%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging operational liquidity vs. competitor.
-46.65%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -31.96%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.91%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 63.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-13.79%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -74.09%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-37.14%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -94.87%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-887.65%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 32.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-70.98%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.