229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
97.25%
Net income growth similar to SONY's 98.84%. Walter Schloss would find parallel expansions or market conditions in both firms’ profitability.
32.78%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -1.93%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
128.93%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -101.51%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
40.94%
SBC growth well above SONY's 10.66%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
-18.72%
Both reduce yoy usage, with SONY at -220.48%. Martin Whitman would find an industry or cyclical factor prompting leaner operational approaches.
-584.49%
AR is negative yoy while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term cash advantage if revenue remains unaffected vs. competitor's approach.
-507.08%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -324.95%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
12225.71%
AP growth of 12225.71% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
242.86%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -176.63%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.32%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -118.79%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
68.74%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -58.68%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
100.00%
Some acquisitions while SONY is negative at -80.79%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pausing M&A or divesting while the firm invests in new deals.
-47.79%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 4.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
27.95%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -1.53%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
88.40%
Less 'other investing' outflow yoy vs. SONY's 447.96%. David Dodd would see a stronger short-term cash position unless competitor invests more wisely.
-30.39%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -12.19%. Martin Whitman suspects a broader cyclical shift away from heavy investing across the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-64.17%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.