PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-11.04%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONY at -313.66%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
2.64%
Less D&A growth vs. SONY's 6.62%, reducing the hit to reported earnings. David Dodd would confirm that core assets remain sufficient.
0.21%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -132.47%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
0.95%
Less SBC growth vs. SONY's 4.03%, indicating lower equity issuance. David Dodd would confirm the firm still retains key staff.
-114.16%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 91.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
153.30%
AR growth of 153.30% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
129.13%
Inventory growth well above SONY's 20.88%. Michael Burry would suspect potential future write-down risk if demand does not materialize.
-134.89%
Negative yoy AP while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see quicker payments or less reliance on trade credit than competitor, unless expansions are hindered.
-52.16%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 179.52%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.38%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 574.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
-5.60%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -58.64%. Martin Whitman would suspect a cyclical or broad capital spending slowdown in the niche.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.63%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -9.43%. Martin Whitman would suspect an environment with fewer attractive securities or a strategic pivot to internal growth.
31.55%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -29.46%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
58.82%
We have some outflow growth while SONY is negative at -90.12%. John Neff sees competitor possibly pulling back more aggressively from minor expansions or intangible invests.
15.48%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -82.02%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
214.29%
Issuance growth of 214.29% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.