PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
59.04%
Net income growth at 50-75% of SONY's 95.60%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging competitiveness unless expansions are planned.
61.88%
D&A growth well above SONY's 12.93%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier depreciation burdens that might erode net income unless top-line follows suit.
247.79%
Some yoy growth while SONY is negative at -97.28%. John Neff would see competitor possibly managing deferrals more aggressively for short-term advantage.
21.65%
SBC growth well above SONY's 17.53%. Michael Burry would flag major dilution risk vs. competitor’s approach.
922.92%
Slight usage while SONY is negative at -244.45%. John Neff would note competitor possibly capturing more free cash unless expansions are needed here.
79.59%
AR growth of 79.59% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a mild difference in credit approach that could matter for cash flow.
-300.60%
Both reduce yoy inventory, with SONY at -424.74%. Martin Whitman would find a widespread caution or cyclical demand drop in the niche.
204.66%
AP growth of 204.66% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
546.99%
Some yoy usage while SONY is negative at -185.80%. John Neff would see competitor possibly generating more free cash from minor accounts than we do.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.41%
Some CFO growth while SONY is negative at -110.84%. John Neff would note a short-term liquidity lead over the competitor.
29.88%
CapEx growth well above SONY's 29.68%. Michael Burry would suspect heavier cash outlays that risk short-term free cash flow vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.39%
Negative yoy purchasing while SONY stands at 3.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s new investments produce outsized returns.
-9.75%
Both yoy lines are negative, with SONY at -43.62%. Martin Whitman suspects an environment prompting fewer sales or fewer maturities within the niche.
-750.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -70.15%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
-213.49%
We reduce yoy invests while SONY stands at 4.53%. Joel Greenblatt sees near-term liquidity advantage unless competitor’s expansions yield high returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-67.24%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.