PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-27.73%
Negative net income growth while SONY stands at 249.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see a comparative disadvantage in bottom-line performance.
0.12%
Some D&A expansion while SONY is negative at -14.73%. John Neff would see competitor’s short-term profit advantage unless expansions here deliver big returns.
-27.12%
Negative yoy deferred tax while SONY stands at 189.31%. Joel Greenblatt would consider near-term tax obligations but a possible advantage if competitor's deferrals become a burden later.
0.52%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -34.93%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-2071.59%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 262.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
-138.88%
Both yoy AR lines negative, with SONY at -120.05%. Martin Whitman would suspect an overall sector lean approach or softer demand.
-315.24%
Negative yoy inventory while SONY is 409.71%. Joel Greenblatt would see a near-term cash advantage if top-line doesn't suffer.
96.99%
AP growth of 96.99% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see a moderate difference that might matter for short-term liquidity if expansions are large.
-95.71%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 416.90%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.40%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 127.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
12.31%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -14.84%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
-860.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -98.22%. Martin Whitman sees an overall caution or integration phase for both companies’ expansions.
5.58%
Some yoy expansion while SONY is negative at -1.97%. John Neff sees competitor possibly refraining from new investments or liquidating existing ones for immediate cash.
16.57%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -4.47%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-131.71%
We reduce yoy other investing while SONY is 164.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term cash advantage unless competitor’s intangible or side bets produce strong returns.
54.68%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -20.52%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.85%
Negative yoy issuance while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a near-term advantage in avoiding dilution unless competitor invests more effectively with the new shares.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.