PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Shows the trajectory of a company's cash-generation capacity. Consistent growth in operating and free cash flow suggests a robust, self-funding business model—crucial for value investors seeking undervalued, cash-rich opportunities.
-21.79%
Both yoy net incomes decline, with SONY at -128.89%. Martin Whitman would view it as a broader sector or cyclical slump hitting profits.
-11.99%
Negative yoy D&A while SONY is 5.28%. Joel Greenblatt would note a short-term EPS advantage unless competitor invests for future advantage.
-35.67%
Both lines show negative yoy. Martin Whitman would see an industry or cyclical factor reducing tax deferrals for both players.
2.20%
SBC growth while SONY is negative at -36.36%. John Neff would see competitor possibly controlling share issuance more tightly.
-101.34%
Negative yoy working capital usage while SONY is 108.63%. Joel Greenblatt would see more free cash if revenue remains unaffected, giving a short-term advantage.
509.74%
AR growth well above SONY's 64.11%. Michael Burry would fear inflated sales or less stringent credit controls vs. competitor.
181.84%
Some inventory rise while SONY is negative at -11.45%. John Neff would see competitor possibly benefiting from leaner stock if demand remains.
-229.00%
Both negative yoy AP, with SONY at -39.51%. Martin Whitman would find an overall trend toward paying down supplier credit in the niche.
-96.64%
Negative yoy usage while SONY is 117.11%. Joel Greenblatt would see a short-term advantage in freeing up capital unless competitor invests effectively in these lines.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.28%
Negative yoy CFO while SONY is 192.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see a disadvantage in operational cash generation vs. competitor.
27.30%
Some CapEx rise while SONY is negative at -15.90%. John Neff would see competitor possibly building capacity while we hold back expansions.
93.52%
Acquisition growth of 93.52% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild outflow that must deliver synergy to justify the difference.
13.29%
Purchases well above SONY's 7.62%. Michael Burry would see major cash outflow into securities vs. competitor’s approach, risking near-term FCF.
54.09%
We have some liquidation growth while SONY is negative at -32.15%. John Neff notes a short-term liquidity advantage if competitor is holding or restricted.
-660.00%
Both yoy lines negative, with SONY at -96.80%. Martin Whitman suspects a cyclical or strategic rationale for cutting extra invests in the niche.
177.74%
We have mild expansions while SONY is negative at -337.90%. John Neff sees competitor possibly divesting or pausing expansions more aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.48%
Issuance growth of 54.48% while SONY is zero at 0.00%. Bruce Berkowitz sees a mild dilution that must be justified by expansions or acquisitions vs. competitor’s stable share base.
-257.35%
We cut yoy buybacks while SONY is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if competitor is gaining a per-share edge unless expansions justify holding cash here.